I'm volunteering at a charity shop. I'm checking a window display outside for the manager, and I stand on something crunchy and check my shoe as I come back in.
Me: "I think I've stood on a green Skittle."
Customer: "Did you just tell him to 'f*** off'?"
Tara: Or a how-to guide? Do you need hats and/or scarves to transport the crabs after you catch them?
Sarah: Gloves, too.
Tara: Oh yeah, the tiny ones can go in the fingers.
Claudia: Hmm my mind went to pubic crabs, I’m so sorry…
Sarah: Oh, me, too. I figured that was why their hair was covered.
From Jen: I see one dragon. Is the other one in his pants? What is he looking for? Disturbing and confusing cover.
Sarah: I think the dragon is yelling I TOLD YOU SO.
Amanda: Also there’s some strange texture going on with his chest.
Sarah: WHAT is with all the crotch-staring cover models? Even the dragon hates it.
From Brigitte: I saw this book couldn’t get over how bad this title is. I hope the ‘zon doesn’t send me any recommendations like this one, because it’s cringe worthy!
Sarah: During a gynecological exam, I expect medical professionals to keep their shirts on, not have them unbuttoned but still tucked in. Am I weird?
Claudia: I read Gorgeous Gyro and frankly that would be vastly preferable than the actual title of this book!
Sarah: I would eat a gorgeous gyro.
Sneezy: Dammit now, now I want a gyro too.
From Melodie: Nominee for the bad font choice award! Amazon claims this book is titled Culgan. But I guess I would be going by an alias too if I had to wear that ugly little capelet to a fight. By his face he knows that he needs actual armor to go against the giant parrot.
Sarah: Is Ulgah wearing a beauty shop drape cover? Was Ulgah interrupted at the salon by a giant bird looking for a fight? I bet Ulgah was mid-coloring and had to step out from under the dome dryer to get the sword.
Claudia: All I know is that Culgari looks mad about the interruption.
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Guardian:
James and Owen were among 41 students who took a coding module at the University of Staffordshire last year, hoping to change careers through a government-funded apprenticeship programme designed to help them become cybersecurity experts or software engineers. But after a term of AI-generated slides being read, at times, by an AI voiceover, James said he had lost faith in the programme and the people running it, worrying he had "used up two years" of his life on a course that had been done "in the cheapest way possible".
"If we handed in stuff that was AI-generated, we would be kicked out of the uni, but we're being taught by an AI," said James during a confrontation with his lecturer recorded as a part of the course in October 2024. James and other students confronted university officials multiple times about the AI materials. But the university appears to still be using AI-generated materials to teach the course. This year, the university uploaded a policy statement to the course website appearing to justify the use of AI, laying out "a framework for academic professionals leveraging AI automation" in scholarly work and teaching...
For students, AI teaching appears to be less transformative than it is demoralising. In the US, students post negative online reviews about professors who use AI. In the UK, undergraduates have taken to Reddit to complain about their lecturers copying and pasting feedback from ChatGPT or using AI-generated images in courses.
"I feel like a bit of my life was stolen," James told the Guardian (which also quotes an unidentified student saying they felt "robbed of knowledge and enjoyment".) But the article also points out that a survey last year of 3,287 higher-education teaching staff by edtech firm Jisc found that nearly a quarter were using AI tools in their teaching.
Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo made a bizarre statement when she introduced Kevin Hassett on Sunday Morning Futures by wishing him a happy Thanksgiving, and weirdly saying "we've got a lot to be grateful for."
WTF is she talking about?
Demented Trump and the Republican party are sending the military into US cities, destroying goods and services, the private US healthcare industry, worsening people's ability to buy food, undercutting and disrupting SNAP, and destroying Medicaid before the New Year.
BARTIROMO: Director Kevin Hassett, great to see you.
Thank you for being here this morning.
And to you, happy Thanksgiving, and we've got a lot to be grateful for.
I guess we can be grateful Trump didn't drop a nuke on Venezuela, so that's something...
Does anyone here know enough about Greek patronymics and ancient Greek names to help to give a reasonable pseudonym to a character from about 300 BCE? I keep looking up lists of names and I am not sure how to get the result I want. And this after a year of college-level Ancient Greek -- we didn't do much that I remember on the nature of ancient Greek names. Also, the textbook was by Liddell and Scott, and while I don't recall who Scott was, Liddell was the real Alice in Wonderland's father.
Help me find the right name for this character, please?
An anonymous reader shared this report from Forbes:
On November 20, at approximately 4 p.m. Eastern time, Napster held an online meeting for its shareholders; an estimated 700 of roughly 1,500 including employees, former employees and individual investors tuned in. That's when its CEO John Acunto told everyone he believed that the never-identified big investor — who the company had insisted put in $3.36 billion at a $12 billion valuation in January, which would have made it one of the year's biggest fundraises — was not going to come through.
In an email sent out shortly after, it told existing investors that some would get a bigger percentage of the company, due to the canceled shares, and went on to describe itself as a "victim of misconduct," adding that it was "assisting law enforcement with their ongoing investigations." As for the promised tender offer, which would have allowed shareholders to cash out, that too was called off. "Since that investor was also behind the potential tender, we also no longer believe that will occur," the company wrote in the email.
At this point it seems unlikely that getting bigger stakes in the business will make any of the investors too happy. The company had been stringing its employees and investors along for nearly a year with ever-changing promises of an impending cash infusion and chances to sell their shares in a tender offer that would change everything. In fact, it was the fourth time since 2022 they've been told they could soon cash out via a tender offer, and the fourth time the potential deal fell through. Napster spokesperson Gillian Sheldon said certain statements about the fundraise "were made in good faith based on what we understood at the time. We have since uncovered indications of misconduct that suggest the information provided to us then was not accurate."
The article notes America's Department of Justice has launched an investigation (in which Napster is not a target), while the Securities and Exchange Commission has a separate ongoing investigation from 2022 into Napster's scrapped reverse merger.
While Napster announced they'd been acquired for $207 million by a tech company named Infinite Reality, Forbes says that company faced "a string of lawsuits from creditors alleging unpaid bills, a federal lawsuit to enforce compliance with an SEC subpoena (now dismissed) and exaggerated claims about the extent of their partnerships with Manchester City Football Club and Google. The company also touted 'top-tier' investors who never directly invested in the firm, and its anonymous $3 billion investment that its spokesperson told Forbes in March was in "an Infinite Reality account and is available to us" and that they were 'actively leveraging' it..."
And by the end, "Napster appears to have been scrambling to raise cash to keep the lights on, working with brokers and investment advisors including a few who had previously gotten into trouble with regulators.... If it turns out that Napster knew the fundraise wasn't happening and it benefited from misrepresenting itself to investors or acquirees, it could face much bigger problems. That's because doing so could be considered securities fraud."
In late October 2025, as much as US$2 billion vanished from a digital marketplace. This wasn’t a hack or a bubble bursting. It happened because one company, Valve, changed the rules for its video game Counter-Strike 2, a popular first-person shooter with a global player base of nearly 30 million monthly users.
For years, its players have bought, sold and traded digital cosmetic items, known as “skins.” Some rare items, particularly knives and gloves, commanded high prices in real-world money – up to $1.5 million – leading some gamers to treat the market like an investment portfolio. As a result, many investment-style analytics websites charge monthly fees for financial insight, trends and transaction data from this digital marketplace.
President Donald Trump didn’t attend former Vice President Dick Cheney’s memorial service on Thursday. He wasn’t a no-show—he wasn’t invited.
It’s customary for sitting presidents to show up when former presidents or vice presidents are laid to rest. Trump’s absence breaks that norm—though in Washington, even the villains have enemies.
Cheney, the architect of post-9/11 executive expansion and a key figure in the Iraq War, died earlier this month at 84. In his final years, he became one of the few Republicans willing to defy Trump openly. He and his daughter, former Rep. Liz Cheney, ultimately voted for then-Vice President Kamala Harris instead of the GOP’s nominee.
“We have a duty to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution,” Dick Cheney said at the time.
Thursday’s service, held with full military honors, drew a bipartisan crowd. The turnout underscored a strange duality: Dick Cheney’s late-life rebellion against Trump left him isolated among his party, yet softened his image for some longtime critics.
Survey Says is a weekly series rounding up the most important polling trends or data points you need to know about, plus a vibe check on a trend that’s driving politics or culture.
In the beginning, there were turkeys.
Benjamin Franklin, of Founding Father and hundred-dollar-bill fame, supposedly wanted them as the national bird. He lost that fight (if it isn’t just a myth), but in the decades that followed, turkeys descended upon the White House, gifted to the president every year for Thanksgiving. With few exceptions, the birds faced the carving knife. The pardons came later.
At least 74 turkeys have been pardoned by sitting U.S. presidents, according to Daily Kos’ analysis of decades’ worth of government archives and news reports. This includes “vice turkeys,” or alternates that are also pardoned and that tag along in case tragedy befalls the main bird en route to Washington.
This week, if history is any precedent, President Donald Trump should pardon two more, raising the number to 76. However, as of Friday, it remains to be seen whether the two birds can scrounge together the requisite donation to his future presidential library to secure their pardons.
Though pardoned turkeys are now given good Christian names like Apple, Marshmallow, and Carl, the first turkey to receive a grant of clemency from a sitting president was a gobbler whose name is lost to history. In 1863, President Abraham Lincoln spared the bird’s life at the behest of his son Tad, who did not want to see his feathered friend face the dinner table, according to popular lore documented by the White House Historical Association.
Exactly 100 years passed before the next turkey found reprieve. President John F. Kennedy pardoned a bird four short days before he himself was assassinated in Dallas, in 1963.
Two turkeys pardoned by two assassinated presidents exactly 100 years apart … coincidence?
Then-President John F. Kennedy is presented with a turkey wearing a sign that says, “Good eating, Mr. President,” days before Kennedy’s assassination.
After Kennedy, Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan were gifted birds and let them live, but it was under President George H. W. Bush that our modern tradition began, with its ceremony and pun-laden speech and all that. And yet … in 1992, mere days after losing reelection and perhaps feeling scorned, Bush stared down that year’s affable gobbler and told it that it was “overweight.” The crowd met his slight with shocked silence.
Despite Bush fat-shaming a bird, he may have been on to something. Live male turkeys top out at around 41 pounds on average, according to the Agriculture Department. But pardoned toms average a girthy 45 pounds, Daily Kos finds.
The biggest on record was an unnamed fella in 1997 that thudded in at 60 pounds. The slimmest was the 30-pound Katie, the first female turkey to receive a pardon. But 30 pounds is heavy for harvested hens, which, at their heaviest, average 17 pounds while alive. In other words, a thicc queen broke the glass ceiling of turkey pardons.
As President Barack Obama said in November 2016, “Yes, we cran.”
Despite their heft, pardoned turkeys have also slimmed down since 1984, when news reports more reliably mentioned a bird’s poundage.
In the 1980s, pardoned turkeys clocked in at 52 pounds on average, among the four birds whose weights Daily Kos could verify. But the 1990s saw the turkeys dabble in the new Atkins craze, with the average weight dropping to 48 pounds. In the 2000s, as the South Beach Diet took off, they dropped another 4 pounds, hitting 44 pounds on average.
The 2010s saw them drop to 42 pounds on average, which they have maintained so far in the 2020s. Their weight-loss journey, like so many of ours, appears to have stalled out during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Whether their slim-down is a positive step toward better avian health or another toxic result of a culture that shames large bodies, today’s pardoned turkeys nevertheless face a better life than their ancestors.
In 1914, two turkeys gifted to President Woodrow Wilson were forced to fight on the White House South Lawn. The winner was served as Thanksgiving dinner.
RIP the penny, the last of which was minted on Nov. 12. And a new YouGov poll finds America split: 39% support killing the penny, and 39% oppose it, with the remainder unsure. The issue has also similar levels of support across the political spectrum—bipartisanship!
Vibe check
Thanksgiving is arguably the food holiday, but what winds up on your plate varies quite a bit based on where you live.
Naturally, turkey tops the overall list of what Americans expect to eat at Thanksgiving, per a new YouGov poll. And it comes in first or second across every region in the country.
But green beans? Only 23% of Americans in the Northeast plan to eat it, while 50% in the South do. That 27-percentage-point gap is the biggest discrepancy between regions, though two other foods come close—and in both cases, the gaps are also between the Northeast and the South.
There’s a 24-point gap on macaroni and cheese (22% Northeast, 46% South) and a 22-point discrepancy on ham (19% Northeast, 41% South).
Altogether, those in the Northeast are less likely to eat a variety of foods at Thanksgiving. Across all the foods, the region averages just 38%, well below the others on what they plan to eat. The biggest variety—an average of 47%—comes from our best food region: the South. (Fight me.)
Luckily, YouGov’s survey also finds that only 11% of Americans say they expect to face political arguments during Thanksgiving celebrations. And hey, if that happens to you, maybe you can bring up everything you now know about pardoned turkeys.
Or you tell them the very true story about how, in 1926, then-President Calvin Coolidge received a raccoon instead of a turkey for Thanksgiving. He spared the raccoon’s life, named her Rebecca, and kept her as a pet.
Then-first lady Grace Coolidge walks the family’s pet raccoon, Rebecca, in 1927.
As we are getting closer and closer to the end of the year, it's time to reflect on everything we achieved in 2025 and ask ourselves what we wish for in the new year to come.
One of our goals for 2025 was to read more. Not an original resolution per se, but still something we felt like we could work on and improve. And if we're being honest, it wasn't as easy as we thought it would be. Convincing ourselves to stop scrolling through memes, put our phones aside, and pick up a book was quite a task, and every page we would read awakened another temptation to throw the book aside and put on a cozy movie on the TV.
However, at some point during the year, we pulled ourselves together and turned this resolution into an actual hobby we enjoy. How'd we do it? Well, we actually owe it all to our cats, who made sure that every time we got into bed to cuddle, no phone was in sight. They kept us in check and ensured that every weekend was filled with the sweet quietness that reading brought with it, and now we can't wait for another weekend to get here so we can do the same thing all over again.
Still, we will never say no to some hisstercial cat memes, just like the ones waiting below.
Pew Research surveyed 5,022 Americans this year (between February 5 and June 18), asking them
"do you ever use" YouTube, Facebook, and nine of the other top social media platforms. The results?
YouTube 84%
Facebook 71%
Instagram 50%
TikTok 37%
WhatsApp 32%
Reddit 26%
Snapchat 25%
X.com (formerly Twitter) 21%
Threads 8%
Bluesky 4%
Truth Social 3%
An announcement from Pew Research adds some trends and demographics:
The Center has long tracked use of many of these platforms. Over the past few years, four of them have grown in overall use among U.S. adults — TikTok, Instagram, WhatsApp and Reddit. 37% of U.S. adults report using TikTok, which is slightly up from last year and up from 21% in 2021. Half of U.S. adults now report using Instagram, which is on par with last year but up from 40% in 2021. About a third say they use WhatsApp, up from 23% in 2021. And 26% today report using Reddit, compared with 18% four years ago.
While YouTube and Facebook continue to sit at the top, the shares of Americans who report using them have remained relatively stable in recent years... YouTube and Facebook are the only sites asked about that a majority in all age groups use, though for YouTube, the youngest adults are still the most likely to do so. This differs from Facebook, where 30- to 49-year-olds most commonly say they use it (80%).
Other interesting statistics:
"More than half of women report using Instagram (55%), compared with under half of men (44%). Alternatively, men are more likely to report using platforms such as X and Reddit."
"Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are more likely to report using WhatsApp, Reddit, TikTok, Bluesky and Threads."
Homebuyer: "Okay, so, the seller's mother-in-law had been living in their basement and decided she didn't want to move out. So, the seller had installed a deadbolt on the basement door for her, and they were expecting us to just go along with her living in the basement."
Theia crashed into earth and formed the moon, the theory goes. But then where did Theia come from? The lead author on a new study says "The most convincing scenario is that most of the building blocks of Earth and Theia originated in the inner Solar System. Earth and Theia are likely to have been neighbors."
Though Theia was completely destroyed in the collision, scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research led a team that was able to measure the ratio of tell-tale isotopes in Earth and Moon rocks, Euronews explains:
The research team used rocks collected on Earth and samples brought back from the lunar surface by Apollo astronauts to examine their isotopes. These isotopes act like chemical fingerprints. Scientists already knew that Earth and Moon rocks are almost identical in their metal isotope ratios. That similarity, however, has made it hard to learn much about Theia, because it has been difficult to separate material from early Earth and material from the impactor.
The new research attempts a kind of planetary reverse engineering. By examining isotopes of iron, chromium, zirconium and molybdenum, the team modelled hundreds of possible scenarios for the early Earth and Theia, testing which combinations could produce the isotope signatures seen today. Because materials closer to the Sun formed under different temperatures and conditions than those further out, those isotopes exist in slightly different patterns in different regions of the Solar System.
By comparing these patterns, researchers concluded that Theia most likely originated in the inner Solar System, even closer to the Sun than the early Earth.
The team published their findings in the journal Science. Its title? "The Moon-forming impactor Theia originated from the inner Solar System."
Having a cat is a ton of responsibility, and when we're young and teenagers, it can be hard to understand the weight of being a pet pawrent. The protagonist in the story below certainly doesn't understand. She gets a cat, but realizes that she can't house it in her place, so she seeks refuge in her girlfriend's home, as she lives with her mom. Her mother wasn't so thrilled initially about the cat, but she warmed up to it. Now, a predicament comes up. The protagonist wants full and complete ownership of the cat and sees it as hers, but the girlfriend and mom now think it's their cat.
To be fair, the cat is being taken care of by the girlfriend and her mom. Despite the protagonist spending most of her time at her girlfriend's house, the primary caretakers are the girlfriend and her mom. This becomes an issue when the girlfriend's mom starts feeding the cat on her own, and starts to take control over the litter box and other cat related things. This creates tension between the owner and her girlfriend, and they get into arguments about it. She seeks internet advice on what to do, but it turns out they're not on her side.
There's so much talk today about relationships and dating. It's collectively unpleasant for everyone, and people across the globe have all the same complaints about dating fomo, ghosting, and general disinterest. But you know who proves day to day how dedicated they are to building love and trust together? Your cats.
Cats are natural romantics. They are sensitive by nature, they're perceptive and pick up on every little nuance that you're experiencing. They're not only a great emotional support system for you as a pet pawrent, they also make wonderful boyfriends and girlfriends. They're loyal, kind, and most importantly, they're absolutely soft, snuggly, and cuddly. They're communicative, empathetic, and are always there for you, just like they're always there for their cat boyfriend or girlfriend.
There's something undeniably adorable about cats who decide that personal space is a myth and emotional independence is for humans. These are the cutesy, co-dependent cat couples who nap in synchronized loaf formation, share one brain cell between them, and meow plaintively if the other goes to the litter box without announcing it first. And honestly? They might be the true green-flag relationship models we never knew we needed. Enjoy these pawdorable cat couples during cuffing season.